by Sam Strano
Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) readiness is the organizational preparedness to align governance, internal controls, and the day-to-day operating routines to enable reliable public-company financial reporting. For leaders navigating this landscape, the goal is a sustainable SOX program that supports consistent execution and can help reduce late-quarter risk and rework. This article highlights selected insights from Deloitte’s perspective on the topic, which can be downloaded here.
For CEOs and CFOs, it really comes down to a recurring, pivotal requirement: Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. That responsibility—formalized through SOX Sections 302 and 906—makes executives directly accountable for disclosures and reporting, placing pressure on leadership and creating direct reputational and legal exposure. The path to confident sign-off can be further complicated by the SOX program’s scope and execution complexity and limited time to prepare, which can elevate the risk of material weakness.
A disclosed material weakness is more than a compliance footnote—it is a direct signal that may erode confidence in the rigor of a company’s financial reporting and internal controls among investors and other stakeholders. In practice, the SOX program can be most effective when it’s treated as an operating discipline: Achieving timely and effective SOX compliance helps build a strong control environment, enhance financial accuracy, and demonstrate a commitment to integrity and transparency. Beyond meeting legal requirements, it is a proactive way to safeguard your brand and create long-term stakeholder trust.
A more contemporary model for SOX readiness may treat internal controls as part of the company’s operating foundation, not a late-stage overlay. It might prioritize early planning and clear milestones, establish a repeatable certification and sub-certification rhythm with clear ownership, and use risk-driven scoping to focus effort on high-risk areas. This modern approach could also use technology and automation to enable manual effort and improve visibility. The practical difference is meaningful: Placing emphasis on internal controls earlier can allow gaps to be identified and solutioned sooner, allowing issues to be addressed and decisions to be made well ahead of the filing deadline.
Personal certification pressure: Make certification a process, not an event
SOX Sections 302 and 906 require the CEO and CFO to sign certifications in their quarterly filings, which raises a practical question: What would make leadership “reasonably rely” on the organization to identify potential issues quarter after quarter? When confidence depends on informal handoffs, inconsistent sub-certifications, or disconnected sign-offs, the pressure concentrates late in the cycle, precisely when time and options are often limited.
A reimagined workflow can treat the certification process with clearer ownership, consistent inputs, and a predictable governance cadence. It is anchored by a dedicated SOX team that connects the work across finance, information technology (IT), and other stakeholders. Additionally, it can be reinforced by visible executive sponsorship that sets expectations for transparency, timeliness, and accountability. A structured process and cross-functional steering committee “stop-and-pause” checkpoint can surface exceptions early and drive. timely escalation. As a result, sign-off can be supported by a clear audit trail, not a last-minute reconciliation. When certification is engineered this way, the organization may be able to reduce late-quarter turbulence and improve decision quality—because confidence is built throughout the quarter, not assembled at the end.
Tackling scope and execution complexity: Prioritize by risk, not volume
SOX readiness can become unnecessarily burdensome when scope is driven by volume rather than risk. As scope expands, execution complexity compounds—especially when financial reporting processes, IT dependencies, and control ownership is unclear or fragmented. The result is often inefficiency, rework, and late-quarter churn.
An updated framework can recognize the broad scope of SOX and complex risk landscape while staying disciplined: Build the program around the areas of high risk, with a sharp focus on risk assessment, scoping and planning to prioritize time and resources. To make that discipline durable, organizations can leverage tested methodologies. For example, the framework developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) provides a practical backbone for designing, implementing, and evaluating controls with consistency, without over-engineering low-risk areas.
In practice, a risk-based strategy should concentrate efforts where it matters. The goal being to align the intensity of the effort with the materiality of the risk—avoiding a “boil the ocean” program that makes SOX unnecessarily burdensome.
The power of preparedness: Mobilize early and mitigate risk
Timelines can be underestimated, and SOX readiness frequently competes with “run-the-business” priorities right up until the first filing clock starts. For many public companies, it can take 12–18 months (or longer, depending on facts and circumstances) to meet requirements. This reality makes an early start even more advantageous, especially when paired with clear milestones to assess and reassess readiness throughout the journey. That journey is easier to manage when it incorporates key stakeholders; covers the influential aspects of the operating model (such as process and control design, documentation and walkthroughs, testing and remediation, and a repeatable quarterly cadence), and makes milestones explicit.
The cost of a late start is often felt early. More than 50% of companies that went public via a traditional initial public offering (IPO) between 2022 and 2024 disclosed a material weakness in their first quarterly or annual filing as a public company.1 Mobilizing earlier can help allow for time to surface gaps, make design decisions, and remediate before pressure peaks—helping to reduce the likelihood that problems will first appear at filing time.
Turning compliance into strategic benefits: The real objective
SOX readiness is about delivering confidence each quarter, especially for newly public companies where leaders face personal certification pressure, grapple with scope and execution complexity, and manage limited time to prepare. Treating SOX as an operating discipline can address these challenges by grounding the SOX program in a structured certification process, risk-based scoping, and early mobilization with clear milestones. This proactive stance helps identify issues earlier, enables timely compliance as the reporting cadence accelerates, and unlocks efficiency gains as the program matures, turning a regulatory requirement into a strategic asset.
Learn how to build a SOX program with a risk-based approach that is focused and efficient. Discover strategies for streamlining certifications, rightsizing scope, and managing timelines in Deloitte’s resource: Public company readiness: Achieve SOX compliance with modern strategies | Deloitte US
Sam Strano is the national managing director and leader for SOX Readiness in the US, while also supporting the broader leadership of Business Controls Advisory services within the Audit & Assurance practice at Deloitte & Touche LLP.
ENDNOTE
- This statistic was developed based on Audit Analytics data and considered companies that went public via traditional IPO with a filing date between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2024. Data includes consideration of any scenario in which a new public company, upon going public, disclosed (1) a material weakness in management’s report on internal controls over financial reporting and/or (2) ineffective disclosure controls and procedures.
Legal
This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication.
The services described herein are illustrative in nature and are intended to demonstrate our experience and capabilities in these areas; however, due to independence restrictions that may apply to audit clients (including affiliates) of Deloitte & Touche LLP, we may be unable to provide certain services based on individual facts and circumstances.
As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, a subsidiary of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of our legal structure. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting.
Copyright © 2026 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.